Development Agreement (Continuance) – Riverstone MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – KB Homes Tampa LLC – Proposed is a Modification to the Development Agreement (DA) for the Riverstone MPUD to Clarify Terms and Conditions Therein
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Continuance Requested
DispositionContinued
Approved to continue the item to the April 17, 2025 Planning Commission meeting at 1:30 p.m. in New Port Richey.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Apr 3, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Apr 3, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDE-25-0144 in full →PDE-25-0144 was taken up 7 times between Apr 3, 2025 and Aug 5, 2025, continued 4 times — this is appearance 1.
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 75% of 8 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Good afternoon, Planning Commission. Gianna German, Planning, Development, and Economic Growth. We're going to get started with the continuance items and I'm going to go a little bit out of order today. We are going to start with item PC5, since PC2 is its companion item. For PC5, you are sitting at the local planning agency, PDE-0144 Development Agreement for Riverstone MPUD-KV Homes Tampa LLC. And this is coming with the request to continue the item to April 17th,
2025 Planning Commission at 1 30 p.m. in Newport Ritchie.
Okay, is the applicant present? Is there anybody here to speak on this item?
Mr. Chair, I have no objection to the continuance, but um I do think that staff needs to fix the subject line for PC five and PC two because first of all they're doing the same thing, so they should not read differently. Um but more importantly the description of what's happening in PC two is not totally accurate because they're asking for more than sixty-six homes, not sixty-six homes, and it's to complete a vision road, not for substitute road improvements. So
I'm not sure who came up with these titles, but they need to be fixed.
Okay.
So if you could just make your continuance subject to staff fixing the titles of PC five and PC two, I'd appreciate it.
Okay. Noted? I want to move on to the next one.