Development Agreement (Consent) – Riverstone (Renner) MPUD – KB Homes Tampa LLC – Second Amendment to the Development Agreement (DA) to Allow the Developer to Receive Certificates of Occupancy for 98 Homes Prior to Completion of Road Improvements for the Renner MPUD to Clarify Terms and Conditions Therein and Rename the Development Agreement from Renner to Riverstone
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionApproved
Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda Items P39 and P40.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 5, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 5, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDE-25-0144 in full →PDE-25-0144 was taken up 7 times between Apr 3, 2025 and Aug 5, 2025, continued 4 times — this is appearance 7.
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 81% of 21 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
P forty. We approved publication in the July 23, 2025 edition Tampa Bay Time, supplemented by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.
Thank you. So for items P40 and P41, there were ex parte forms that were submitted after the agenda was published. We did send those to the clerk's office for documentation. So item P40 is PDE 25-0144. It's a development agreement in the name of Riverstone Renner MPUD. KB Homes, Tampa, LLC. This is a Second Amendment to the development agreement or the DA to allow the developer to receive
certificates of occupancy for 98 homes prior to completion of road improvements for the renter MPUD. to clarify terms and conditions therein and rename the development agreement from Renner to Riverstone. This comes with a recommendation of approval.
Is that the um Okay, is there anyone here who wishes to speak? I guess this there's two for this project, right? Correct.
You need to do them individually. Go ahead.
Okay. Um and I had questions of staff in my meeting yesterday that I asked to present today. So Whichever one is appropriate, I want to talk about the multi use path. So I'll pull one of these off. Which is the more appropriate one?
Um probably the M P D. Substantial modification.
Mm-hmm.
All right. Okay, so we'll pull that one off.
I would say yes.
Which one? Forty or forty one? Forty
one.
Okay. So leave this one on then if Okay. And then we'll go to forty one. Well well let's pull forty one. So that's it. So I'll take
proof approval. Did you call for Yes,
I asked her to pull forty one.
No. Did you call for public comment on
forty?
Yes. Okay.
And I look to my board members if they had any questions too. We will
approve the consent agenda except for P forty one. Okay.
Um in my question that I asked um um the two Akas in my well, one Akha and Joanna in my meeting yesterday was you need Oh, sorry. All in favor? Aye. Um I just was trying to g figure out the alignment of that multi-use path through this area.