Petition to Vacate Portion of Right-of-Way (REGULAR), along Scenic Drive - GS Automotive, LLC - No Funding Required
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionApproved
Approved Staff’s recommendation by roll call vote with Commissioner Oakley absent from the vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 30, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 30, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
FAC-20-0136 in full →Heard once. FAC-20-0136 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- Jun 30, 2020BoardP22▶Approvedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 4m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 83% of 29 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Um we're going on to P ther uh twenty-three, P twenty three. Well P card P22, I apologize, P22.
Proof of publication, Tampa Bay Times, May twenty-fourth, twenty twenty, May thirty-one, twenty twenty.
Heather Wolf, Real Property and Planning. The real property and planning team has received a petition to vacate portion of platted right-of-way filed by GS Automotive. The right-of-way is located west of US 19, adjacent to Scenic Drive. The proposed area to be vacated consists of 2,744 square feet. The purpose of this vacation is to allow for the sale and redevelopment of the adjacent parcel into a Take 5 oil change.
There were no objections to this petition and the team recommends approval.
Thank you. Any questions?
Uh um Uh one quick question. Can you put that picture back up? That you just had.
So So what are they doing there?
The existing building that is currently there is an automotive repair shop. That building is going to be demolished and turned into a take five oil change. However, to reconfigure the lot properly so that the structure will fit and meet the uh setback requirements, a vacation is required. of a portion of the right-of-way that just kind of cuts through the the front of that parcel.
Okay. Well that's great. Uh because they do a very nice job of landscaping. That'll really help that area aesthetically because it needs it. Okay, I'm good.
Thank you. Mr. Chairman Mariano. Commissioner Mariano. Uh thanks for keeping the map up. When I look at the sidewalk it's being cut up, I'm sure you're gonna make arrangements where the sidewalk's gonna continue around as well when the new development comes in.
I yes, the existing plans that were approved by our planning and development team do allow for the sidewalk to continue. It's going to be landscaped with uh different types of myrtles and some uh strawberry.
Thank you. I'll move approval.
Uh just uh one second. She just said something that caught my ear. Um that we got away from using and crate myrtles as
required
trees and and landscaping because half the year they're dead.
I don't know the great Myrtles. I will have to defer to uh Miss Wilheit's
So let's go ahead and let the applicant on then. Applicants representative on
Go ahead, Barbara, you're unmuted.
Hi, Ford Will Hide again, can you hear me?
Yes.
Good afternoon again. So I do not have a landscape detail in front of me um for the vacation. But um I mean we're gonna meet the requirements. And as Mr. Starkey has said, PACE PI does a nice job with their landscaping. We'll also fix the five blocks in that area. But I'm just gone because of the legal aspects of a vacation.
Okay. Just note that I was probably sure we got rid of the The uh the freight myrtles as part of required trees because they're not a tree. That half the year ago.
I'll second the motion.
Okay, I have a motion by Commissioner Mariano, if I'm not correct, and a second by Commissioner Starkey. Madam Clerk, please follow the roll.
District three, Commissioner Starkey.
Aye. District four, Commissioner Weightman. District five, Commissioner Mariano.
Aye.
District two, Chairman Mariano.
Hi, motion passes four zero. Uh uh P twenty three, do we have proof, please?