A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CONNECTED CITY CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN AS REFERENCED IN THE CONNECTED CITY STEWARDSHIP DISTRICT - BCC 2-7-17 - NO FUNDING REQUIRED
Approved minutesApproved.
42 in the published record, 2 in the recordings
42 items
Published agendas and the dispositions the approved minutes recorded. Twelve years, whether or not a camera was running.
Approved minutesApproved.
Approved minutesApproved to Adopt by a roll call vote.
Approved minutesApproved as part of the Rezoning Consent Agenda.
Approved minutesApproved the Consent Agenda including Addendum A-C1
Approved minutesApproved.
Approved minutesApproved Staff’s recommendation by roll call vote.
Approved minutesApproved Staff’s recommendation including the installation of fire hydrants as discussed.
Approved minutesApproved to continue to a date uncertain.
2 moments
Machine transcription of 283 recorded meetings — 9% of decided items have one. Speaker names are inferred from voice and can be wrong.
Seth Weightman We need to find a way To have A similar style park within Connected City. And whether we look at how do we relocate funds based on the shortfall that the superpark is going to have, whether we restructure the way that funding mechanism works, I think it needs to because Connected City is here today. The youth and the parents. are demanding That we have filled space. for you name the sports that are evolving, I mean Cricket, baseball, softball. You named this poor. They're needing space and there are people here now. And before Connect City keeps going on, I know everybody's looking at the forty acres, but Keith, correct me if I'm wrong.
Seth Weightman the roads and everything, it's it's gonna create congestion. Connecticut City has city in its name. There needs to be community users, true community users within the Connecticut City uh boundaries. I think it's it's time now that we know what we know and that and what the folks and our customers are demanding that we take a look at it. So Keith Based on our conversation, share what you're comfortable with or not. Sure. But