23 in the published record, 0 in the recordings
In the record
Published agenda23 items
Published agendas and the dispositions the approved minutes recorded. Twelve years, whether or not a camera was running.
No item matched every word, so this matched any of them — most words first.
- Oct 18, 2023Planning
P5No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda - Oct 18, 2023Planning
P6No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda An Ordinance By The Pasco County Board of County Commissioners Amending the Pasco County Land Development Code Section 602, J. “Ben” Harrill Villages of Pasadena Hills Stewardship District, Revisions To Exhibits 602-A 602-B, 602-D and 602-E, And Amending Other Sections, As Necessary, For Internal Consistency, Providing for Applicability, Repealer, Severability, Inclusion Into The Land Development Code, And An Effective Date.
- Jul 27, 2022Planning
W2No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda An Ordinance By The Pasco County Board Of County Commissioners Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment To The Future Land Use Element Chapter 2 Goal FLU 6: J. “Ben” Harrill Villages Of Pasadena Hills: To Make Roadway Changes In Figures PH-2, PH-4, PH-4a, PH- 8, PH-12 And PH-13; And Other Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency, Providing For Severability, And An Effective Date.
- Jul 27, 2022Planning
W3No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda An Ordinance By The Pasco County Board of County Commissioners Amending The Pasco County Land Development Code Section 602, J "Ben" Harrill Villages Of Pasadena Hills Stewardship District, Revisions To Text, Tables, And Exhibits; Text Revisions To Single Family Lot Chart And Section 602.10.E.6 (D) Volume Over Capacity (V/C) Ratios Greater Than 1.2 At Intersections; Table Revisions To Exhibit 602-C Transportation Development Fee Schedules; Revisions To Exhibit 602-D Property Owners Credits; Map And Table Amendments To Exhibit 602-E Master Roadway Plan; Add New Cross Section 60AA, And Revised Illustration of Cross Section 70AA To Include Family Bike Paths, And Amending Other Sections, As Necessary, For Internal Consistency, Providing For Applicability, Repealer, Severability, Inclusion Into The Land Development Code, And An Effective Date.
- Feb 16, 2022Planning
P4No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda An Ordinance By The Pasco County Board Of County Commissioners Amending The Pasco County Land Development Code; Chapter 600 Overlay And Special District Areas; Section 602.8 M.3: Village of Pasadena Hills (VOPH) Impact Fees, Mobility Fees And Development Fee Surcharges and VOPH Transportation Development Fee Schedules (Exhibit 602-C); And Other Amendments As Necessary, For Internal Consistency; Providing For Applicability; Repealer; Severability; And An Effective Date.
- May 19, 2021Planning
P1No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda An Ordinance By The Pasco County Board Of County Commissioners Amending The Pasco County Land Development Code; Chapter 600 Overlay And Special District Areas; Section 602.8.T: VOPH Development And Administration Review Fees; And Map Change To Exhibit 602-E VOPH Master Roadway Plan Exhibit A Tyndall Road / East West Street A Right Of Way Realignment; And Other Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For Applicability; Repealer; Severability; Inclusion Into The Land Development Code; And An Effective Date.
- Aug 26, 2020Planning
P3ApprovedPublished agenda PASADENA HILLS ROADWAY NETWORK ALTERNATIVE STANDARD REQUEST (CONSENT) – District School Board of Pasco County – Not Constructing Roadway Improvements Along Kiefer Road Per LDC Section 602 Pasadena Hills Exhibit E Roadway Network Typical Section 142AA and LDC Section 901.8 Pedestrian Facilities – East Pasco County - Approximately 540 Feet east of the intersection of Curley Road and Kiefer Road (Pasadena Hills PPC:8/26/20, 1:30 p.m.; Dade City)
Approved minutes
Approved as part of the Public Hearing Consent Agenda by a roll call vote.
- Nov 19, 2025Planning
PC4No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Conditional Use (Consent) – 1884 Robert Aborizk/T-Mobile South, LLC – 155-Foot Above-Ground-Level (AGL), Close-Mount Monopole Wireless Communications Facility (WCF) in an A-R Agricultural-Residential District – East Central Pasco County – On the North Side of Simons Road File Number PDE26-CU02
- Feb 19, 2025Planning
PC1No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Ben R Turner Trust, Ben R Turner ttee/Pasadena Trail – Change in Zoning from a A-C Agricultural District to a AR-5 Agricultural-Residential District – East Central Pasco County – Southwest Corner of the Intersection of Clinton Avenue and Meigs Lane – Containing Approximately 37.55 Acres
- Feb 19, 2025Planning
PC2No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Andrea and Josephine Mannino – Change in Zoning from a A-R Agricultural-Residential District to a R-4 High Density Residential District – Central Pasco County –South Side of Tyndall Road, Approximately 900 Feet East of Curley Road – Containing Approximately 10 acres.
- Nov 6, 2024Planning
PC2ApprovedPublished agenda Zoning Amendment - Substantial Modification (Consent) – Watergrass MPUD – CKB Development LLC – A Rezoning Request to Substantially Modify the Watergrass MPUD to Amend the Promenade Business Center Uses and to Allow for the Donation of a Library Site to Pasco County.
Approved minutes
Approved the item per Staff’s recommendation.
- Oct 18, 2023Planning
P8No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Regular) – Joseph Disano – Change in Zoning from an A-C Agricultural District to an A-R Agricultural-Residential District – East Central Pasco County – At the Terminus of Pommel Place Approximately 330 Feet South of Broken Bit Lane – Containing Approximately 5.01 Acres
In the room
Transcript0 moments
Machine transcription of 283 recorded meetings — 9% of decided items have one. Speaker names are inferred from voice and can be wrong.
Nothing in the recordings matches Penny for Pasco
. Most meetings have no recording, so a result of zero does not mean the county never discussed it.