3 in the published record, 12 in the recordings
In the record
Published agenda3 items
Published agendas and the dispositions the approved minutes recorded. Twelve years, whether or not a camera was running.
- Oct 8, 2024Board
C14No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda C7No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Accept Multi-Use Trail Easement Agreement – 3KS Family, LLLP – Orange Belt Trail – No Funding Required
- May 9, 2023Board
C15No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Accept Multi-Use Trail Easement Agreement – 3KS Family, LLLP – Orange Belt Trail – No Funding Required
In the room
Transcript12 moments
Machine transcription of 283 recorded meetings — 9% of decided items have one. Speaker names are inferred from voice and can be wrong.
- Orange Belt Trail meeting in San Antonio
Oakley Sure. 'Cause you reminded me of one another item that I had that I didn't bring up and the reason you Reminded me of it. It was about the Orange Belt Trail. So your name just rings out trails. So I thought about it and we had a meeting last week at San Antonio. With the city council and Had this meeting and we answered her questions and they were upset people. And I thought I was walking into the room that a lot of upset people because of the trail. And in actuality they were not upset about the trail at all. They actually want the trail. They just didn't want to meandering down through the small streets and small areas they have through the neighborhoods. they were felt that was imposing on their homes and things of that nature. So they're trying to choose that we take it and go back to County Road fifty two alignment to Happy Hill and then across to Planton
- Orange Belt Trail meeting in San Antonio
Oakley Road. Ramsey Road and Blandon Road that way. In the actuality when you do that, you bring that trail And it can go all the way to Platinum All the way trilvy. It connects to the Hardy Trail. And then if you take that point where it hits... Uh Bland Road. on that first hit where you go to Landon. go right there and connect there back to the Hardy Trail, you have a huge circle.
- C7Accept Multi-Use Trail Easement Agreement – 3KS Family, LLLP – Orange Belt Trail – No Funding Required
Oakley Yeah. Commissioner Weightman. Thank you. Thank you, Chairman Mariano. in my neck of the woods. Let's let's confirm what Commissioner Starkey is stating and let's reach out to the property owner and the right-of-way. and and let them know and that way everybody's everybody's covered and try to limit the expense and exposure to to the the the neighboring landowner, please.
- C38Local Agency Program (LAP) Agreement, Budget Amendment, and Budget Resolution – Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Pasco County – Construction and Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) Activities for Pasco Elementary - Fort King Road from Hester Road to North of Coleman Avenue Sidewalk Project (FPN:4455031 58 01) – $971,218.00 Grant Funding
Oakley So I think that'd good be report back and see where the Orange Belt Trail plays into this so we make sure that hardy connection all trail connection gets gets done the right way. So but
- board reports Dade City Carers and Orange Belt Trail
Oakley Letters from the City of San Antonio dated September 20th, 2023, regarding opposition to the Green Belt Trail Route B1. Pasco County Commissioners, we the five members of the San Antonio City Commission are writing on behalf of the concerned members of our community to express our strong opposition to the proposed B-1. Route of the Orange Belt Trail within San Antonio. As representatives of over fourteen hundred residents of San Antonio and Pasco County, As well, it is a necessity for us to do our due diligence in protecting the interest of well-being and well-being of our community. While we appreciate Pasco County's efforts to expand recreational opportunities and promote connectivity, we believe that the proposed B one route. Poses significant drawbacks and concerns for our community. Route B1 of the Orange Belt Trail Route intersects with several residential neighborhoods, leading to concerns of privacy, safety, and noise pollution. The increased
- C7Accept Multi-Use Trail Easement Agreement – 3KS Family, LLLP – Orange Belt Trail – No Funding Required
Oakley Commission Weightman. Thank you, sir. Um Yeah good Good point on liability, Commissioner Starkey. I just want to make sure that the private landowner, you know, obviously people can if there's if if if the general public they'll folks wander, right? So I worry about the liability and the liability coverage that the private landowner would have to have. And that's just an additional cost to that private landowner. So Agreeing with Commissioner Starkey. Let's make sure that we limit the liability to the private landowner that's gonna be, you know Sharing this this space together. So that's just my concern uh with it. Yeah
- board reports Dade City Carers and Orange Belt Trail
Oakley by the project. We urge the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners to undertake a more comprehensive and inclusive community engagement process to ensure that the trail aligns with the wishes and values of our residents. In conclusion, we firmly request the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners not proceed with selecting Route B one. uh for the Orange Belt Trail within San Antonio. While we are not opposed to the Orange Belt Trail as a project overall, we are strongly opposed to any route that would of the city of San Antonio's residents through streets. Routes B two and B three, adjacent to State Road 52 and County Road 52. Would have a less significant impact on the San Antonio community and residents. We believe that a more thoughtful and community-driven approach is necessary to address the concerns of residents, protect our environment, and enhance our city's recreational offerings. We look forward to further dialogue and collaboration with the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners to find a solution that benefits our
- Commissioner Weightman report
Oakley Okay. Let me add something since you brought up the orange belt uh orange belt drill. It's a very important trail. There's been a misunderstanding with the people on the east side of the county. They they are thinking that we're cutting their land in half. Right. We're going over their land. So that message got out and people just exploded that. When that's not gonna happen at all. We're not going to condemn any of their property. Right. We're not gonna cut their property in half. And they need to understand that this trail is gonna be for the use coming across our entire county. And coming into the east side of the county is gonna be a very well used Aren't about trail. So and and we'll add to the better things that are coming in in the Pasco and in the east side.
- board reports Dade City Carers and Orange Belt Trail
Oakley foot and bicycle traffic in these areas may disrupt the crank tranquility and security that residents have long enjoyed in their homes qualities many have sought after and appreciated in their decision to call San Antonio home. Moreover, the potential for increasing Uh increased littering, vandalism, and other undesirable activities along the trail is a worry for many. Residents have approached the city commission with fears of imminent domain Oh.
- board reports Dade City Carers and Orange Belt Trail
Oakley and discomfort with having a public trail in close proximity to their private homes and yards. Traffic congestion and safety are additional worries associated with the B One route. Sections of the trail would intersect with small residential through streets, including Railroad Avenues, Michigan Avenue. and Joe Herman Drive, creating potential hazards for residents of the streets, trail users, and motorists. The increased number of pedestrians and cyclists on these roads, particularly those intersecting Curley Street, where traffic and road maintenance is already a major concern would lead to an uptick in accidents endangering lives and property. We believe that the proposed Orange Belt Trail Route does not adequately consider the preferences and needs of our community. There have been limited community engagement and input in the planning process, and we feel that our concerns have not been adequately addressed. Pas of the proposed routes have changed between public meetings with sparse with sparse details available, leading to confusion and uncertainty over who will be directed. impacted
- P55Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Kokolakis West MPUD – SR 52 Limited Partnership and Jen Holdco LLC – Rezoning Request from an A-C Agricultural District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Maximum Development of 155 Single Family Detached Dwelling Units (DU), 67 Single Family Attached Dwelling Units, 168,799 Square Feet (SF) of Support Commercial, and 125,000 SF Corporate Business Park/Target Industry/Light Industry and Associated Infrastructure on Approximately 177.48 Acres Located in Central Pasco County
Oakley The th I mean the the short answer Nictorius Pito's playing development economic growth, the short answer is that yes, we can have developers build their segments of the Orange Belt Trail in this case, and it can be done for mobility fee credits on the bike pad portion of the fee. From the background version.
- board reports Dade City Carers and Orange Belt Trail
Oakley community as a whole. Thank you for your attention to this matter, respectfully submitted. City Commission of San Antonio, John T. Vogel, the second mayor, Mark B. Anderson, Mayor Pro Tem, Alison Cagle, Parks Commissioner, Kevin Can't read the last name. It's kind of like a Water Commissioner and Sarah Schrader, Street Commissioner.