42 in the published record, 9 in the recordings
42 items
Published agendas and the dispositions the approved minutes recorded. Twelve years, whether or not a camera was running.
Approved minutesContinued to July 25, 2016 in Dade City.
Approved minutesApproved.
Approved minutesApproved to Adopt by a roll call vote.
Approved minutesApproved as part of the Rezoning Consent Agenda.
Approved minutesApproved the Consent Agenda including Addendum A-C1
Approved minutesApproved.
Approved minutesApproved Staff’s recommendation by roll call vote.
Approved minutesApproved Staff’s recommendation including the installation of fire hydrants as discussed.
Approved minutesApproved the item per Staff’s recommendation.
Approved minutesApproved to continue to a date uncertain.
Approved minutesApproved to continue the item to the May 6, 2025 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in Dade City.
Approved minutesApproved to continue to the March 11, 2025 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in Dade City.
9 moments
Machine transcription of 283 recorded meetings — 9% of decided items have one. Speaker names are inferred from voice and can be wrong.
Jaimie Girardi Well it seems to me, I mean I I'm not the planner you guys are, but It seems to me that would be more important to connect to Connected city. Uh we're using the name connected now. But that would be more important to connect the property in connected city as opposed to property that's not in connected city. Hard in the pocket. Well Connected City was given that name for multiple reasons, but part of it was interconnectivity. Yeah. Um so I'm not sure why we're not interconnecting to other property in Connected City.
Jaimie Girardi This I ever I just th that's the question I just asked. The mesh the motion was a complete moratorium. It it was new rezoning, new site plans, new building permits, any further development in Connected City.
Jaimie Girardi Okay, so probably you need to remake your motion. You want a moratorium on new rezoning and site clan approvals? Within the connected city planning area until we've developed these land development regulations. Is that more accurate?
Jaimie Girardi I think about a year ago the board asked for a workshop on both the villages of Pasadena Hills and Connected City and To the best of my know I d realize it's predated you, but to the best of my knowledge those workshops have not occurred yet. So is there a plan of action to For the board to kind of hear an update on where we stand in Connecticut City.
Jaimie Girardi theory in theory for the part that they're connect connect getting from the city, yes they have to pay more. Unless the city can figure out a way to bifurcate their rates for uh there may be a way to do that for new development that
Jaimie Girardi I get that, but I the my concern is it becomes misleading to the residents of Connected City if we're saying that the community hub zone is going to have a large district park when we all know that the parks department has not developed any plan, funding plan, any plan whatsoever to develop a district park. In Connected City, and that they're fundling all the money in this area to the VOPH superpark. And my my my recollection is that part of the reason that Connected City and VUPH were required to have this entire golf cart network of you know infrastructure was so that Anybody could take a golf cart to this large district park and VOPH, and that was going to be the in fact some of the connected city money. um roadway money went to VOPH to build the road to the superpark. So I my question really is when the board took all of those actions, adopted a master plan for parks, didn't include a park in Connected City, funneled
Jaimie Girardi There was a slide that was shown by the power speaker that had various uses by district and had the parks language in it. If we go back. There you go. So my question for Planning Department is When the Parks Master Plan was developed and the park impact fee was a park impact fee that went to this commission, um, and I realize this commission voted against it, but but it was ultimately adopted by the board, but that parks master plan did not include a district park in Connected City. So my question is So there really is no funding source to develop a large district park in Connected City and my understanding is a lot of the Connected City impact fee actually going to the V O P H superpark. And the stats plan was that the VOPH superpark would become the district park for both BOPH and Connected City. My question to planning is when that all of that happened, probably after this Connected City plan was developed Why didn't we go in and fix this reference that says there's gonna be a large district park and the community hub zone if that was never
Jaimie Girardi Well the difference with schools is that at least with schools in Connected City there was a surcharge developed to help fund the acquisition of school sites. So um I understand Mr. Williams' concern but at least it was addressed. Agreed. And and there are some school sites in yes in Connected City, so it's not quite the same level of problem is missing cultural centers. Now, I will tell you that most more recently, and this was evidenced at Starkey, the cultural centers of many of these areas tends to be where libraries are located and we tend to our libraries are morphing into sort of libraries slash cultural centers. So to me the real breakdown here is Why was there not a library plan somewhere in Connected City? Because that could have that could have functioned as the cultural center for Connected City. And we have a library impact fee. Um And has libraries commented at all on these MPDs and
Jaimie Girardi So And I just wanted to clarify uh this this is your motion. Okay, uh see you could and you all voted I just wanted to make sure that Mr Engels on the same page about what the motion entails. So The motion is a complete moratorium within the Connected Cities Special Planning Area for a period of time for us to develop new land development regulations.